Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Health

Turns 10: Who Are the Real Science Deniers?

Photo By NASA On Unsplash
Photo by NASA on Unsplash

For the 10-year anniversary of An Inconvenient Truth, those of us who aren’t sold on massive use of taxpayer money for clean-energy projects are yet again labeled in denial about the science of climate change. Latest case in point: a rather fawning interview of Al Gore by WIRED magazine lacking questions about the impact of climate change legislation and subsidies on consumers (particularly lower-income folks), GDP growth and the current scientific state of today’s renewable energy sources. According to WIRED,  subsidy skeptics are borderline neanderthals enough to make an enlightened climate activist’s “brain explode.”

In truth, many of us who don’t support behemoth public energy gambles are clear-eyed in understanding the impact these policies have on the poor and middle class–people who see energy costs as a higher proportion of their expenses than richer families. Thus, when countries attempt to shift to renewables too quickly, these shifts hurt the poor the most, as was the case in Germany, where trillions of dollars in experimental mandates and subsidies for clean energy, and a fearful shift away from nuclear energy, resulted in an increase in greenhouse gas emissions along with a major hit to consumers. As The Wall Street Journal reported:

“Germany’s current path of increasingly high-cost energy will make the country less competitive in the world economy, penalize Germany in terms of jobs and industrial investment, and impose a significant cost on the overall economy and household income,” warned Daniel Yergin, vice chairman of research firm IHS. … Average [German] electricity prices for companies have jumped 60% over the past five years because of costs passed along as part of government subsidies of renewable energy producers. Prices are now more than double those in the U.S.”

I’m all for creative destruction and finding alternatives to carbon energy, but all this begs the question: who is in denial about the limits of our current scientific breakthroughs on clean energy?
P1-BR135A_ENERG_D_20140826173603
An analogy: let’s say that we had the national goal of reducing obesity. Certainly laudable. Then let’s say we forced everyone to take an anti-obesity pill that wasn’t yet proven effective and cost poor and middle class families much more than rich families. And despite all these efforts, obesity actual rose. Who would be in denial about the science around that pill?
It’s not that we’re in denial about whether climate change exists, it’s more we want to be measured and smart about public money. Once science has caught up with the vision of where climate activists want to go–e.g. solely renewables–then let’s move Joe Six Pack there. For now, please quit the name-calling.

Photo by Global X Cc

2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. Arationofreason

    July 2, 2016 at 7:03 am

    Keep telling it like it is Carrie.

  2. jameshrust

    July 2, 2016 at 5:29 pm

    Great story. I wish the politicians in this country would see what is happening in Germany’s electric bills. Germany is frequently held up as the poster boy of success in the promoting of solar and wind energy.
    James H. Rust, professor of nuclear engineering

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

19 − six =

You May Also Like

Opinion

We’ve all heard of the 50/30/20 rule when it comes to budgeting our expenses. It is one of the most popular ways to manage...

News

A photonic quantum computer chip did nine thousand years’ worth of work in 36 microseconds. Now that’s fast. And I can’t even finish my...

Health

Since the pandemic started over a year ago, signs of burnout in employees have increased exponentially. A little over two-thirds of employees are suffering...

Entertainment

Kanye West is releasing Donda 2 exclusively on the Stem Player, a device created by Kanye in collaboration with Kano Computing. The device includes...

Copyright © 2020-2022 Bold TV. Bold TV is owned and operated by the Foundation for American Content and Entertainment, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization.